Friday, March 7, 2014

Evaluate: Self-Reflection on Teaching Abilities

Evaluate: Self-Reflection on Teaching Abilities

My teaching abilities are shifting with the demands of teaching in the 21st century.  When I started using technology tools in the classroom in 2000, I was ahead of the curve in the educational field, but behind the curve in the real world.  Unlike most people,  I am really bad slow at learning new things.  My brain needs to have some time to develop a cadence and a storage space for the new skill or understanding. It took me over 20 blog posts to really get in the swing of how to do this- and how to best respond to the Quests in the TOOL MOOC.  In some ways, my learning is pedantic.  Yet in other ways, it is instantly transformative. That being said, I think that learning new things slowly makes me a good teacher.  It helps me to do a better job of explaining steps or concepts to children.  It also helps me to understand why I need to give them plenty of practice opportunities in order to develop their own cadence.

My classroom is messy.  Science is messy.  When I am under pressure, the last thing  I will drop is my time to interact with the students.  This has been a very stressful few weeks, so - yes, my classroom is messy.  I'll be going in early on Monday morning to start to straighten things up, even though I know that by the end of the day, it will again be messy.  My colleagues say that I am creative, and that sometimes being creative has its drawbacks.  I would agree.  My students love the creativity.  I have been told that I "over-motivate" their child by my creativity.  Ah, but their child is creating amazing digital artifacts that reflect her wondrous learning.

I give.  To my students, to my colleagues, to anyone who needs something.  If I have it, I give it.  Usually appreciated are my lesson plans, supplies, or chocolate.  Usually not appreciated is the unsolicited advice.

I get them.  The students know me and i know them.  I get them.  They are amazed when i seem to be reading their minds.  It makes me feel really cool when they say, "Wow, how did you know that?"

They trust me.  I am their teacher, not their buddy, and the line of distinction is very clear.  Yet, they tell me things and ask for help and are open and honest with me and with each other within my classroom walls.

I forget.  I forget their names.  I forget the names of these sweet children who love and trust me.  Yet, I know their hearts, their personalities, and what they missed on the last test.   How can this be?  I tell them all the time, "It's really hard living inside this head."  When I use work samples from 10 years ago, I can tell them all about the wonderful characteristics of the child who made it just by seeing the project and their name.

I grade with fairness and consistency.  Unfortunately, I grade slowly.  The rubrics help, and the computerized grading provided by quia.com has saved me on countless times.  If I could sit with each of them and grade their work, I would be happier.   It is the personal touch and the feedback that i so want to give to them, which is a good thing- and something I do well, but it makes me grade slowly.

I engage them.  They do my homework and my projects with relish and gusto.  (Think I'm kidding?)  I tell lame jokes that they are sure that I made up, and they laugh at them and retell them to each other.  It must be a grandmother thing.  They listen intently to my talks (lectures with notes) and then to each other as they grapple with the new concepts or apply learned concepts to new situations.

I'm not so good at pedagogical terms.  I feel them.  An expert can watch me teach, and I am intentional about what I do.  Yet- when it is time to use the terminology, all I can think of is that I love my students and help them to grow.

I'm reflective. Brenau University was my Alma Mater, and their teacher training programs put self reflection as a matter of surviving the ever evolving and sometimes revolving education systems that I had aspired to join.  In the past 10 years, the focus on the use of data has heightened so much that I wouldn't even consider using a new approach unless there was data showing substantial benefits in doing so.

I creatively follow directions.  (That's not saying that I do my own thing.) What I mean by that is that on one day, I will interpret the directions in a completely different way than on another day.  Which is why I reflect- and check back, like I did tonight and discovered that I had totally invented my own set of instructions for this last TOOL MOOC blog post.  Thank goodness!  If I hadn't, what would have been here would have been just what is below this line:
____________________________________________

I am a data nerd. I use data to drive my instruction, my assessments, my choice of learning activities, and any remediation activities needed.  What good would it do to use these resources to drive instruction if I were't reflecting on my lesson development, delivery, and assessment practices?  A key practice that I employ is active reflection.   I model it and my students have take it up.  The dialogue goes something like this:


"what worked well with that?"/  "Students were  engaged."         
"What was their take-away?" / "They understand heat transfer."
"What was supposed to be their take away?" / "Convection, conduction, and radiation."                  ' 

 "That IS heat transfer.  Did they get MORE?"
 "Yes, lol- some far transfer to why the  cafeteria was so hot at the dance."      

"What didn't go so well?"          /"It took longer than anticipated."       
"How would you improve your plan" / "Use timers for each segment of activity."

They crack up when they hear me, but now, I can tell that they have engaged their minds along with mine and they are actually talking it through for themselves. Students are always engaged in self-assessment in my classroom; which is a really good thing, as we set goals together for the student to reach and for me to support.  As much student goal setting and reflection that I put to use in my classroom, I do so much more so in my own self.  My community of teachers practice reflection on a regular basis.  Why be a stagnant person when you can be dynamic- and ever changing, improving, and being a part of a society that needs good teachers now more than ever.  

Sometimes it is hard to look at myself, especially as my own worst critic.  I could rewrite every lesson and change every lab and certainly find mistakes in every  project rubric.  But that's not really the point.  The point is to keep growing as a person and as a professional.   The point is to grow these kids as people and future professionals.  The point is to be a part of a community that is preparing society, one child at a time, to be society.

Evaluate: Differentiation 3.1.1

Evaluate: Differentiation 3.1.1

Test data can (should) be used to differentiate instruction.  According to the summary report below, I have four groups of students.  One group does not meet mastery, another group that just under mastery, a group that meets mastery level, and a group that exceeds mastery.  These results help to inform my instruction over the next few days.  My two lower groups will meet with me in "grade recovery time" for additional instruction and opportunities to apply the concepts in a way that would enter long term memory and become a tool for future use.  As I am in a F2F setting, but use a blended model, this meeting can take place in a google document where I place a learning object and the invited students work towards solving the problem that I present and answering some of the guiding questions.

My higher fliers can be teamed up on google documents as well and challenged to create concept maps or other visual representation of meaningful course content.  This could be a reflective piece, a connective piece, or an anticipatory piece.



 This set shows me that I have 7 or 8 students who will need remediation.  Depending on the context of their missed questions, I can either select from my tool kit of activities or develop new activities to meet their content knowledge deficiencies.


Thanks to the information contained in this report, I can see which distractors were the most common- and glean an understanding of the students point of view and perception of the content.  I can also use this data to craft my response - remediative or enriching.



Evaluate: Rubrics and Competencies 2.1.2

Evaluate: Rubrics and Competencies 2.1.2

A competency is the degree to which a student can accomplish a task or give evidence that he or she has mastered the content.

Below are two screen shots.  On is a portion of the rubric with 5 listed criteria that Canvas calls Learning Outcomes.  Students receive a numerical score for the outcome that correlates to their performance.



This screen shot highlights the gradient of mastery, which makes i clear that the "Learning Outcome" is indeed a competency.  Each of the learning outcomes in the rubric have learning outcomes associated. (As it should be i education.)


Evaluate: Data Driven Instruction, Analytics, Reporting Tools 2.1.1

Evaluate: Data Driven Instruction, Analytics, Reporting tools 2.1.1

"Instruction that is driven by data is to education as travelling across country with GPS is to arriving at your destination."  - K. Salomon

Teachers can improve their own instruction, their instructional objects, their use of instructional tools, as well as the success level of their students by considering what data collected could be showing.  Some different types of data:

Student Self-Monitoring Data- 

Students Monitor their own learning and track their progress by checking their LMS assessment and feedback section.  Students can additionally see their testing history and set goals for future achievement. Teachers could work with students and support them in reaching their goals.  I have a specific reward for each of my students if the meet their personal CRCT goal. If they meet my "stretch goal" they will be invited to an ice cream sundae party.  (I am in a F2F classroom at this time.)  Student self tracking of data is an important lifetime skill to help them to develop in these formative years.

Monitoring course progress and feedback- 
Instructors can monitor student progress in the LMS in a few different ways.  The number of logins and time spent on tasks are available in some systems.  Instructors can use that information to see of students are regularly attending class and working on their goals, or if the efforts are all last-minute.  More checks by instructors early in the semester may increase student achievement if the instructor communicates to the student about the student level of involvement and what is to be expected.  Encouragement and motivation "applied" early in the course can help students to make significant changes in their work habits to achieve higher grades and have a more fulfilling learning process.

Monitoring enrollment and attendance-
Enrollment, attendance, communication, and student type information can be obtained from the LMS.  This information is crucial in determining the path forward from any point in the course.  Whether a student is achieving at his or her ability level or not can be determined by utilizing this data and teachers should always consider this data before contacting a student to encourage them.

Applied Analytics-

Analytics in other ways also help to drive instruction to increase student success.  First- test questions can be reevaluated if large numbers of students are missing certain questions.  Only through the use of data can a track record for a particular question be obtained.  Attached are two screen shots of a test and the data on some of the questions.   In one case, there was a problem with the test item and in the other case, some reteaching needed to be done.





Evaluate: The Summative Assessment 1.1.3

Evaluate:  The Summative Assessment 1.1.3

I use a service for testing called quia.com.

Validity- To ensure that the summative assessment is valid, my curriculum group meets to develop common assessments.  This professional collaboration helps to keep the test items focused on uncovering what a student has mastered as well as areas of concern.  We begin with the AKS- Academic Skills and knowledge. (Gwinnett County's form of the State Science Standards)  Using vetted resources, our Professional Learning Community develops test questions designed to test the student knowledge of the content.  We track data on each test item.

Reliability- The tests are scaled with DOK and aligned with the curriculum standards.  We track the questions with problems and improve them every year.  This test has had 3 revisions since its inception and is continuously being improved and adjusted to meet student needs and to align more closely with the standards.

Security- The test security is relatively good.  Students cannot access their test unless they log in to the secure website to take the test.   I have the option of making the test questions viewable or not after the test, so the content is able to be kept secure.  Information regarding the time the test began and ended is recorded along with the scores, attempts, and missed questions.  This information keeps me well informed in case a student tries to take the test twice.  Student information is not visible to anyone without secure login, which keeps the student safe.

An example test is attached.  There are dynamic graphics associated with the test, and available to be viewed in the attached PDF file.   Summative-Assessment_Example   The viewer would be better served to open the attachment than to try to view the test without graphics as it would take 16 pages to expand below.





Evaluate: Quality Feedback 1.1.2

Evaluate: Quality Feedback 1.1.2



Formative feedback occurred at several steps through this project as I checked in with each group of four at least three times during the course of the project.  I have hidden student names and such for privacy.  This is meaningful in that they grew to trust me early in the year- that I would not grade them on anything less than their final project.  What could not be captured is the chat sessions that were ongoing thourghout the project when students were online synchronously.  The comments that are captured are from asynchronous sessions. The following image is of the project as they neared completion.  There are more substantive comments from me regarding digital citizenship, the content, and a suggestion for higher order thinking: 







Evaluate: Formative Assessment 1.1.1

Evaluate:  Formative Assessment 1.1.1


Formative Assessment 1 and 2:  

When the scope of what I want to learn about them is large, I sometimes use a pre-test.  Below are 2 pretests that I have developed. These are formative assessmenst that I use to see what my students already do know.  Since we have 4 feeder schools to our middle school, students can have a wide range of former science experiences. I receive disaggregated data from quia.com.  Use any name to access the preassessment.


Quia.com
Earth Science: Ch 10-11-12 PREASSESSMENT Erosion, Deposition and Hydrology
http://www.quia.com/quiz/1162131.html

Canvas
What do you already know about weathering, erosion, and deposition?


 

My favorite formative assessments, however, are the ones in which students explore with hands-on materials. One example is when I challenge the students to keep an ice cube from melting.  They all get a plastic bag with an ice cube, aluminum foil, 2 paper towel squares,  a sandwich bag, and tape.  I watch and take notes as they try various configurations to see if their ice cube could survive until the end of the class.

At the end of the week, students have the opportunity to try the challenge again.  This time, after learning about insulators and conductors, most students were able to "Save" their ice cubes until the end of the class.